<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sausage Factory</title>
	<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/</link>
	<description>Constitutionally-limited government, 1688-2006, RIP. Pass the bananas.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sinner</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2238</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2238</guid>
					<description>Rumpole

that is what is required: I'd go futher and ban every member of the Labour party not only from voting, but from receiving any public office, civil service job, benefit, use of public heath and education services etc etc.

an example must be made.

&lt;i&gt; Sinner there is not much wrong with our judiciary - at least with respect to holding the executive to account.&lt;/i&gt;

We shall see. the highest officer in the judicary is not the Attorney General or Solicitor Genearl but the Governor General. We will know if there is justice soon enough,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumpole</p>
<p>that is what is required: I&#8217;d go futher and ban every member of the Labour party not only from voting, but from receiving any public office, civil service job, benefit, use of public heath and education services etc etc.</p>
<p>an example must be made.</p>
<p><i> Sinner there is not much wrong with our judiciary - at least with respect to holding the executive to account.</i></p>
<p>We shall see. the highest officer in the judicary is not the Attorney General or Solicitor Genearl but the Governor General. We will know if there is justice soon enough,
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2230</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2230</guid>
					<description>Keep the Court case going. The NZ courts have hinted that retropsective legislation will be read down - see R v Pora and R v Poumako. Sinner there is not much wrong with our judiciary - at least with respect to holding the executive to account. The highest court in the land was very strong in the F&amp;#38;S case and the newly constituted Supreme Court has consistenly ruled against the Government in the Zaoui litigations. Keep challenging the actions of this corrupt government - it is time for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the Court case going. The NZ courts have hinted that retropsective legislation will be read down - see R v Pora and R v Poumako. Sinner there is not much wrong with our judiciary - at least with respect to holding the executive to account. The highest court in the land was very strong in the F&amp;S case and the newly constituted Supreme Court has consistenly ruled against the Government in the Zaoui litigations. Keep challenging the actions of this corrupt government - it is time for a change.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2215</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2215</guid>
					<description>Oh I totally support that!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I totally support that!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rumpole</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2168</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2168</guid>
					<description>Another thought - Don could publicaly announce using taxpaymers money of course that if elected he would invalidate Labours legislation, prosecute every MP and official who was party to Labours overspending thus a conviction would remove every Labour MP involved, insistence on repayment personally with IRD interest &amp;#38; penalties to bankrupt them &amp;#38; the party and for good measure remove their right to a parliamentary pension if they have a criminal conviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought - Don could publicaly announce using taxpaymers money of course that if elected he would invalidate Labours legislation, prosecute every MP and official who was party to Labours overspending thus a conviction would remove every Labour MP involved, insistence on repayment personally with IRD interest &amp; penalties to bankrupt them &amp; the party and for good measure remove their right to a parliamentary pension if they have a criminal conviction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rumpole</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2167</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2167</guid>
					<description>Regretfully I think we all know that the GG will not be another Kevin Brady and if he fails to act it will demonstrate the post is redundant aas he has no role. The public could of course petition for Kevin Brady to be awarded the highest NZ honour next time - that would not amuse Helen!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regretfully I think we all know that the GG will not be another Kevin Brady and if he fails to act it will demonstrate the post is redundant aas he has no role. The public could of course petition for Kevin Brady to be awarded the highest NZ honour next time - that would not amuse Helen!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sinner</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2165</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2165</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;the New Zealand Parliament no longer uses pairs&lt;/i&gt; 

damn. I wasn't sure about the electorate seats.

So this is just another aspect of the Labour gerrymander;
the Whitlam precedent (which could have saved us yesterday) was on their mind when they made that change.

Hopefully the GG will decide not to sign. appoint Brash as caretaker
and this - as so many other things - can be fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the New Zealand Parliament no longer uses pairs</i> </p>
<p>damn. I wasn&#8217;t sure about the electorate seats.</p>
<p>So this is just another aspect of the Labour gerrymander;<br />
the Whitlam precedent (which could have saved us yesterday) was on their mind when they made that change.</p>
<p>Hopefully the GG will decide not to sign. appoint Brash as caretaker<br />
and this - as so many other things - can be fixed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2164</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2164</guid>
					<description>Aww crap I'm going to have wear one of those stupid hats with the corks now aren't I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww crap I&#8217;m going to have wear one of those stupid hats with the corks now aren&#8217;t I.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nicholas O'Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2162</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2162</guid>
					<description>Keep the court case going. If all else fails try section 12 of the Bill of Rights that mentions the Right to vote in &quot;genuine ... elections&quot;. If one party has access and the right to use $824 524 of free money, which other parties don't have acess to the election is not genuine. I'd love to see labour try and rush through legislation which states &quot;Previous government actions which may have violated the New Zealand bill of Rights Act 1990 are now validated&quot; and &quot;Section 12 of the Bill of Rights is now repealed.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the court case going. If all else fails try section 12 of the Bill of Rights that mentions the Right to vote in &#8220;genuine &#8230; elections&#8221;. If one party has access and the right to use $824 524 of free money, which other parties don&#8217;t have acess to the election is not genuine. I&#8217;d love to see labour try and rush through legislation which states &#8220;Previous government actions which may have violated the New Zealand bill of Rights Act 1990 are now validated&#8221; and &#8220;Section 12 of the Bill of Rights is now repealed.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2159</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2159</guid>
					<description>Advance Australia Fair......

Everybody sing along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advance Australia Fair&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Everybody sing along!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2158</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/18/the-sausage-factory/#comment-2158</guid>
					<description>Bernard - keep the legal eagles on the case. Another avenue will present itself to have a crack at Helen. Labour and allies have now said they are above the law and that makes them even more vulnerable. The anger amongst people at yesterdays proceeding is extraordinary and the issue will not die. Good luck and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard - keep the legal eagles on the case. Another avenue will present itself to have a crack at Helen. Labour and allies have now said they are above the law and that makes them even more vulnerable. The anger amongst people at yesterdays proceeding is extraordinary and the issue will not die. Good luck and keep up the good work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
