<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Government Is Above The Law</title>
	<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/</link>
	<description>Constitutionally-limited government, 1688-2006, RIP. Pass the bananas.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Heartburn Home Remedy</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-63036</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-63036</guid>
					<description>My fellow on Facebook shared this link with me and I'm not dissapointed at all that I came to your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fellow on Facebook shared this link with me and I&#8217;m not dissapointed at all that I came to your blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RobertM</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-25511</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-25511</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo Update Database&lt;/strong&gt;

Add your blog to yahoo database</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo Update Database</strong></p>
<p>Add your blog to yahoo database
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bank foreclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-17497</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-17497</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;bank foreclosure&lt;/strong&gt;

bank foreclosure source</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bank foreclosure</strong></p>
<p>bank foreclosure source
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: car heater seat</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14824</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14824</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;car heater seat&lt;/strong&gt;

ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 car heater seat foundation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>car heater seat</strong></p>
<p>ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 car heater seat foundation
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: guaranteed car loan</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14816</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14816</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;guaranteed car loan&lt;/strong&gt;

ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 The best of guaranteed car loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>guaranteed car loan</strong></p>
<p>ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 The best of guaranteed car loan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: car computer tester</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14811</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-14811</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;car computer tester&lt;/strong&gt;

ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 Description of car computer tester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>car computer tester</strong></p>
<p>ha-rd-po-rn-fu-ck 668772 Description of car computer tester.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pacific Empire &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Banana Republic Day Report</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2079</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2079</guid>
					<description>[...] When I heard the news about the retrospective legislation being rammed through Parliament, I think went through the classic &amp;#8217;stages&amp;#8217;.  First I was stunned and almost in denial (&amp;#8221;They can&amp;#8217;t do it.  They can&amp;#8217;t!&amp;#8221;), then I was angry (&amp;#8221;We need to storm Parliament&amp;#8221;), then I got depressed (&amp;#8221;Oh man, its time to leave the country.&amp;#8221;) and eventually it sank in and I accepted it.  After explaining the situation to my girlfriend (yes I&amp;#8217;m sorry ladies, I&amp;#8217;m taken  ) and  thinking things over at work, in one moment I synthesised three ideas: Bernard&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;banana republic&amp;#8217; statement, previous Libz activism where we gave out free cigarettes, and my girlfriend&amp;#8217;s idea said that someone should protest at Parliament. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When I heard the news about the retrospective legislation being rammed through Parliament, I think went through the classic &#8217;stages&#8217;.  First I was stunned and almost in denial (&#8221;They can&#8217;t do it.  They can&#8217;t!&#8221;), then I was angry (&#8221;We need to storm Parliament&#8221;), then I got depressed (&#8221;Oh man, its time to leave the country.&#8221;) and eventually it sank in and I accepted it.  After explaining the situation to my girlfriend (yes I&#8217;m sorry ladies, I&#8217;m taken  ) and  thinking things over at work, in one moment I synthesised three ideas: Bernard&#8217;s &#8216;banana republic&#8217; statement, previous Libz activism where we gave out free cigarettes, and my girlfriend&#8217;s idea said that someone should protest at Parliament. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MY</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2026</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2026</guid>
					<description>Bernard - thank you so very much - you are right, it is a moral victory, and you are a hero.  You have the courage, intellect, and wisdom that so many of us sorely lack.  And this pitiful woman wouldn't have a chance in court - and she knew it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard - thank you so very much - you are right, it is a moral victory, and you are a hero.  You have the courage, intellect, and wisdom that so many of us sorely lack.  And this pitiful woman wouldn&#8217;t have a chance in court - and she knew it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nicholas O'Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2018</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-2018</guid>
					<description>&quot;As for wether or not Labour is corrupt there is little more corrupt than stealing $800 000 and then once caught retrospectively vcalidating theRpassed in 1933 putting Hitler above the law&quot;
Should read:As for wether or not Labour is corrupt there is little more corrupt than stealing $800 000 and then once caught retrospectively validating the theft by changing the law. This bill is similar to enabling act the German Reichstag passed in 1933 putting Hitler above the law</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for wether or not Labour is corrupt there is little more corrupt than stealing $800 000 and then once caught retrospectively vcalidating theRpassed in 1933 putting Hitler above the law&#8221;<br />
Should read:As for wether or not Labour is corrupt there is little more corrupt than stealing $800 000 and then once caught retrospectively validating the theft by changing the law. This bill is similar to enabling act the German Reichstag passed in 1933 putting Hitler above the law
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sinner</title>
		<link>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-1984</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/17/the-government-is-above-the-law/#comment-1984</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;How did the Aussies go about getting GG to do it ?
&lt;/i&gt;

The have a senate; the senate held up the budget; the GG then fired Whitlam
(just before Whitlam managed to call the queen and fire the GG).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitutional_crisis_of_1975

&lt;i&gt;, justified their use of any legal means, however unconventional, to force what they saw as a reckless and incompetent government out of office. &lt;/i&gt;

in this case, it would be refusing to supply pairs to the government;
or promosing NZF MPS who voted against the govenrment list places 
at the next election. 

But, actaully, Whitlam is not the precedent that applies here. The right thing to look at is the case of state premiers: Greiner, and a whole bunch in WA

&lt;b&gt;who resigned as soon as they were cited for corruption&lt;/b&gt;

That is what should have happend a year ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How did the Aussies go about getting GG to do it ?<br />
</i></p>
<p>The have a senate; the senate held up the budget; the GG then fired Whitlam<br />
(just before Whitlam managed to call the queen and fire the GG).</p>
<p><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitutional_crisis_of_1975' rel='nofollow'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitutional_crisis_of_1975</a></p>
<p><i>, justified their use of any legal means, however unconventional, to force what they saw as a reckless and incompetent government out of office. </i></p>
<p>in this case, it would be refusing to supply pairs to the government;<br />
or promosing NZF MPS who voted against the govenrment list places<br />
at the next election. </p>
<p>But, actaully, Whitlam is not the precedent that applies here. The right thing to look at is the case of state premiers: Greiner, and a whole bunch in WA</p>
<p><b>who resigned as soon as they were cited for corruption</b></p>
<p>That is what should have happend a year ago.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
