http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/ Constitutionally-limited government, 1688-2006, RIP. Pass the bananas. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:34:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1823 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:13:21 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1823 National should put a vote of non confidence in the speaker if only to place on public record her record of partiality and bias and hopefully ensure that history records Wilson as the worst speaker in NZ history. National should put a vote of non confidence in the speaker if only to place on public record her record of partiality and bias and hopefully ensure that history records Wilson as the worst speaker in NZ history.

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1773 Fri, 13 Oct 2006 07:05:01 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1773 Is the need for "validating legislation" about the money, or more about the fact that some offenders may be ineligible to stand for Parliament again due to their offending aginst the Electoral Act? Is the need for “validating legislation” about the money, or more about the fact that some offenders may be ineligible to stand for Parliament again due to their offending aginst the Electoral Act?

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1716 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:50:12 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/10/12/speakers-response/#comment-1716 Surely there is a relevant rule here about conflict of interest?? Surely there is a relevant rule here about conflict of interest??

]]>