Archive for September, 2006

Carry On Rorting

Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

Yesterday the Prime Minister was all full of unfounded insinuation about how Libertarianz could afford to hire a QC to take this case. The corollary question of how Labour can afford a QC to defend it has been answered by today’s Dominion Post. Labour’s defence is being paid for by … you!

A spokesman for Miss Clark confirmed yesterday that Labour’s “parliamentary funding” – which includes her leader’s fund – was being used to pay Queen’s Counsel Hugh Rennie.

That’s right, accused of misappropriating money from the leader’s fund to illegally pay for their election advertising, they pay for their defence from the very same fund they’re accused of ripping off in the first place. Absolutely shameless.

Once again I remind you: Libertarianz Asks Nicely

‘Basher’ Hodgson Has a Go

Monday, September 11th, 2006

Labour “strategist” (I’ll create the diversion, you start the getaway car) Pete Hodgson has had a crack at Libertarianz this morning in the wake of the Prime Minister’s comments about the funding of this case. His “strategy” seems to be to muddy the waters and try and slag off Libz in the same breath as banging on about National and the Exclusive Brethren.

Hodgson’s release: National Needs to Come Clean on Brethren.

My response is here:

Libertarianz: Libertarianz Asks Nicely, Labour Steals.

I should really thank Helen and ‘Basher’ for this one. After a big flood of donations in June and July, when this was kicked off, things were down to a trickle. I’ve just been told that there’s been a noticeable increase in people using the Pay Pal button today. Welcome to the conspiracy folks. Your secret handshake is in the post.

Prime Minister in a Spin

Monday, September 11th, 2006

The Prime Minister must be getting dizzy. She was on breakfast TV this morning (hat tip: Not PC) and then on Paul Holmes, in reply to my interview. (Julian has audio of my interview, as does Newstalk ZB.)

Helen Clark is pretty upset that anyone has the nerve to stand up to her and wants to know “how little right wing outfits like the Libertarianz have got the money to hire QCs.”

Of course, the question is not how we have the money to hire QCs (thanks again to all the donors, by the way). The question is how the Prime Minister got the money to pay for her pledge cards. Our money has been given freely. Hers was stolen from the public purse.

UPDATE: Prime Minister on Breakfast, Prime Minister on Newstalk ZB.

Five Years Ago

Monday, September 11th, 2006

It’s hard to believe it’s been five years. It’s also odd to think that five years after Pearl Harbour, both the Japanese Empire and Nazi Germany were just acrid memories. Such is the power of correctly identifying your enemy and then being prepared to win.

On the morning of September 11th, 2001 I visited the frighteningly gaudy Cao Dai church in Southern Vietnam. Caodaism is a synthesis of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Catholicism with a bit of Victor Hugo thrown in for a reason I didn’t quite follow. In the afternoon I crawled through the Cu Chi tunnels and was given a tour through an old minefield by an ex-North Vietnamese Army officer-turned-comedian. So the day was quite freaky enough long before any nutters with Stanley knives got involved.

I watched the whole thing unfold live on TV in a bar in Saigon. It was something like ten o’clock at night local time and the bar was thumping to ‘Paint It Black’ and other Tour of Duty favourites. Western TV stations, music and news, were playing silently around the room until one of us realised that something odd was going on on the news channel. Music down, TV up - all in French, but the burning building was unmistakable. There was a lot of chatter about what was going on, no one having paid attention in French classes, and wondering how you get a bomb big enough to make that hole half way up a skyscraper.

The second plane answered that question. I have never, before or since, felt what I felt in that fraction of a second when the whole awful thing became apparent. With one pulse of my heart my blood turned to ice.

Statue of Liberty / World Trade Center

Then came the Pentagon and the collapse of the towers and the rush of confused Americans with relatives in Washington and New York running in and out of various bars asking if anyone knew anything, making ruinously expensive phone calls. There were 20,000 dead. A dozen highjacked planes. The pickpockets, hookers, and tat-selling urchins that usually ply the seemingly-rich, well-lubricated crowd did not have a good evening.

“Top QC Takes PM to Court” - Sunday Star Times

Sunday, September 10th, 2006

The Sunday Star Times has a story this morning (”Top QC Takes PM to Court“) about this case, featuring Tony Molloy. (As usual this was blogged on Kiwiblog first. DPF must get up earlier in the morning (7am on a Sunday!) than I do.)

The emergence of Molloy - known as a tenacious battler - as senior counsel in the Darnton claim could cause further trouble for the MPs as they struggle to dampen public disquiet over the pledge card spending.

Let’s hope so.

Exit Strategy

Saturday, September 9th, 2006

Audrey Young, the NZ Herald’s political editor has a good piece out this morning, One One Exit For Labour. She notes that Labour’s fightback against National can only last so long because, even trying to bully National as much as they like, ultimately they have to contend with the Auditor-General’s findings. And even then they can’t do the only sensible thing and look humbled a) because they don’t know how to, always being right and all, and b)

Contrition will be out of the question if it implies in any way that Labour knowingly bent, stretched or flouted funding rules before the close election, because that meets the legal definition of a corrupt practice.

Bugger.

Young suggests that the only way to calm the waters will be to get out the chequebook. I, along with others, have said that paying it back isn’t enough. Labour knowingly stole public money to fund their election campaign, breaking the fundamental rules that separate liberal democracy from dictatorship, they refuse to admit fault even with overwhelming evidence against them, they have obfuscated and shamelessly tried to get their arms further into the till, they regard “honesty” as a political slogan with no real meaning, and they have issued threats against media outlets and opposition members who point out their misdeeds.

The only acceptable conclusion is that Helen Clark and her cronies go. She is not fit to govern. I don’t care if they resign or if more honest Labour members launch a coup against the cabal that is destroying their party. The Clark regime’s time is up.

Nascar Politicians

Friday, September 8th, 2006

Entirely peripheral to this case, but relevant to the mud-slinging that hs grown up around it, is this piece from Good magazine.

In the 2006 midterms, Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Rick Santorum (R-PA), both running for re-election, have raised the most money of any candidate in their respective parties. Here are the NASCAR-style uniforms they would wear if companies were proud of their political donations, and if running for senate required a flame-retardant suit.

Political NASCAR

A project for the team at Gen X-Y perhaps?

Or maybe the Prime Minister wearing the shirt off the taxpayer’s back.

Six Years in Prison

Thursday, September 7th, 2006

Illinois’ biggest political corruption trial in years has just concluded.

Former Governor George Ryan […] was sentenced today to six years in federal prison for […] using taxpayer dollars for his campaign and other offenses.

Just saying.

Stench of Dishonesty

Thursday, September 7th, 2006

Anyone with half a brain must know by now that there is something rotten in the state of New Zealand politics and the odour of dishonesty emanating from Parliament must have citizens of the capital walking the streets with pegs on their noses.

So says Garth George in a NZ Herald opinion piece commenting on the pledge card rort, Phillip Field, and the koha/lafo brouhaha.

He blames MMP, saying

That half the people in Parliament are there thanks to political party patronage and, for all their protestations to the contrary, owe the electorate no allegiance or even service leaves us powerless.

And concludes

I’m glad I like bananas.

In other news, Trevor Mallard has promised to go nuclear and start spreading tabloid gossip on opposition MPs who insist on calling the government corrupt just because they stole public money to buy an election. Presumably National will follow suit and one can only dream that Mutual Assured Destruction ensues.

The Kiwi Herald reports that Don Brash has declared a National ‘people’s government’ in exile.

We are starting at the famous Kaiaua Fish and Chip shop and then on Thursday we will head off to the Happy Wok in Botany Downs where we will probably introduce a flat tax rate.

Gun Gets Smokier

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

In response to my post about GMan’s audio recording of the Prime Minister contradicting her defence to this case, Phil from Pacific Empire has found similar material in the Prime Minister’s offical hagiography, Portrait of a Prime Minister.

The idea was simple - a card, just like a credit card, with a photograph of the Party’s leader, and a series of election promises

So in addition to the Auditor-General, the then Solicitor-General, and the Chief Electoral Officer, the list of people who thought the pledge card was electioneering also includes the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister’s official biographer.

Paying It Back Isn’t Enough

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

The New Zealand Herald editorial this morning covers Labour’s problems with paying back the pledge card money stolen from the public purse and has some not very nice things to say.

One of the plans that has been floated is to pay it back (but not really) by underspending next year’s parliamentary budget. This proves that Labour just doesn’t get it. The problem is that they stole public money to pay for their electioneering. Paying it back with another set of public money is not a solution. It is, however, a perfect illustration of Labour guile.

The Herald concludes:

There is no way around Labour’s liability for its errors at the last election. It must pay the bill and call it a salutary lesson in the limits to which the public will pay for political puff.

But it must do more. In comments at Not PC, Julian makes the very good point that “paying it back” isn’t enough.

Paying it back does not impose a sanction for breaking the law and acting immorally. The amount of money is nominal. It is the fact that the government (who sets the laws of this country) believes that it can break the law with impunity.

If Labour pays the money back, or devises some scheme to pay it back, then the “pay it back” brigade will presumably be happy. Well I will not be.

And neither will I. They need to admit their wrongdoing and assure us that they will not steal public funds again. Right at the very start of this case I pointed out that Crown spending of public money not appropriated by Parliament is a violation of one of the laws that separates a liberal democracy from a dictatorship. Labour needs to decide which side of that fence they’re on.

A Smoking Gun

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

Remember that Labour’s only possible defence against the claim that they misappropriated the money for the pledge cards is that the cards were parliamentary business and not election advertising.

GMan notes:

[T]hose things that are on TV every 10 minutes … are, in fact, 30-second mini-TV programmes altruistically designed to educate you on what it might be like if you coincidentally just happened to buy the things featured on them.

Further down in this post he reveals that he’s made a discovery in the last few days. He has a tape of Helen Clark recorded at a public meeting just before the last election.

She starts:

When I called the election I said that it was going to be about leadership and credibility and values.

Well, it’s kind of turned out that way hasn’t it? :-)

Last election we issued another pledge card. We ticked those off as well. And this time it’s a third pledge card, and it’s going to take the form you can see there. And over the past two and a half weeks or so I’ve been announcing one-by-one the pledges which are going to go on the card, and I’ll talk about those today, and I have more to announce in the period now, leading up to the launch of the Labour Party election campaign.

Followed by half an hour of explaining how the pledge card is the centrepiece of their election campaign.

Thanks, Helen. If you could just explain that to the judge we should be able to wrap this up pretty quickly.

Bumper Stickers

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

If “Pay It Back” is a bumper sticker slogan it might as well be on a bumper sticker, thought Duncan Bayne. You can get yours at his online store.

Pay It Back bumper sticker

The target market for this product is 81% of the voting population.

Honesty “a National Party slogan” - PM

Monday, September 4th, 2006

Well it’s hardly a Labour Party slogan is it?

Hat Tip: Not PC.

The recent poll result that had 81% of the public demanding that Labour pay back the stolen pledge card money has the Prime Minister in a spin. PC caught her on Newstalk ZB this morning interpreting this as “81% of New Zealanders support National Party sloganeering”.

So there you have it. According to Helen Clark, honesty is nothing more than a political slogan. As I’ve said before - not fit to govern.

Back from Blenheim

Sunday, September 3rd, 2006

I’m back from a week away in Marlborough and Nelson, enjoying lots of wineries and the sunshine that’s been so lacking in Wellington recently.

Bernard outside Waihopai