http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/ Constitutionally-limited government, 1688-2006, RIP. Pass the bananas. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:36:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-48100 Fri, 30 May 2008 12:46:14 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-48100 a screw loose, a screw loose,

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-26303 Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:48:23 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-26303 insurance claims homeowners <a href="http://www.reallifelog.com/homeowners" rel="nofollow">insurance of homeowners</a> insurance claims homeowners insurance of homeowners

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-23900 Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:05:48 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-23900 /index. /index. <a href="/index." rel="nofollow"></a> /index. /index.

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-231 Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:04:38 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-231 Fucking hell Rumpole, I'd be sorely tempted to vote for the party that promised that. Fucking hell Rumpole, I’d be sorely tempted to vote for the party that promised that.

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-125 Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:36:21 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-125 Think on this Cullen - an incoming non labour government decides to revalidate the now previous legislation adding that a breach carries the potential of a 5 year jail term, the overspend is repayable with interest and all MPs party to the original decision and the validating legislation will have their parliamentary pension cancelled,. In one go you bankrupt the labour party, remove virtually the entire complement of labour MPs and a fair number of others from parliament who then have to earn an honest living without even having to waste taxdollars on imprisioning the guilty. Still like retropective, validating legislation Cullen - bring it on Think on this Cullen - an incoming non labour government decides to revalidate the now previous legislation adding that a breach carries the potential of a 5 year jail term, the overspend is repayable with interest and all MPs party to the original decision and the validating legislation will have their parliamentary pension cancelled,. In one go you bankrupt the labour party, remove virtually the entire complement of labour MPs and a fair number of others from parliament who then have to earn an honest living without even having to waste taxdollars on imprisioning the guilty. Still like retropective, validating legislation Cullen - bring it on

]]> http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-124 Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:55:24 +0000 http://www.darntonvsclark.org/2006/08/12/whats-in-a-name/#comment-124 So part of the Bill of Rights 1688 will no longer apply? So part of the Bill of Rights 1688 will no longer apply?

]]>